Q&A · ESMA
EU trading venue through sub-delegated DEA and exemption offered under Article 2(1)(d) of MiFID II
Only Tier 1 DEA clients, who obtain the use of a member's trading code directly, have direct electronic access and so lose the own-account dealing exemption in Article 2(1)(d) MiFID II; Tier 2 clients using sub-delegated access do not hold the code and can still rely on the exemption.
Details
| Reference | ESMA_QA_1619 |
|---|---|
| Issuer | ESMA |
| Published | 15 Nov 2017 |
| Answered | 15 Nov 2017 |
| Submitted | 15 Nov 2017 |
| ESMA topics | Direct Electronic Access and algorithmic trading |
| Earlier Q&A document | ESMA 70-872942901-38 MiFID II MiFIR market structures Q&A, Q&A 3.24 |
Provisions it relates to
- Article 2 MiFID II · ExemptionsExplicit reference · 90%
- MiFID II (whole act)Explicit reference
Documents it refers to
- RTSIn forceExplicit reference
AI summaryRTS 7 on organisational requirements of trading venues that permit or enable algorithmic trading: covers governance, compliance, staffing and outsourcing, member due diligence, conformance and algorithm testing, capacity, monitoring, business continuity, volatility mechanisms, pre- and post-trade controls, and conditions for direct electronic and sponsored access.
- RTSIn forceExplicit reference
AI summaryRTS 6 on organisational requirements for investment firms engaged in algorithmic trading, providing direct electronic access or acting as general clearing members: covers governance and compliance, testing and deployment of algorithms, annual self-assessment, stress testing, kill functionality, market abuse surveillance, pre- and post-trade controls, DEA client due diligence and order record keeping.